zbert's Blog

zebert I like this post. Just think Hillary has already stated that if you're not willing to buy into the " Hillary National Care Plan " she is willing to have your wages garnished. She hasn't been able to project any costs for this FINE undertaking of her's as well.

Got news for you, zbert. The same thing happens right here in private health care. It's not a problem of public health care vs. private health care -- it's a matter of people not being professional and doing their jobs with the patient, rather than profit or cutting corners, in mind. Of course, one might disagree if one is a shill for greedy doctors and insurance companies...

For once Z-bert I am going to have to agree with you! Government health care is not a step in the right direction and that is apparent when you look at the way they run other things! This would just be another way for the government to get their hands in yet another "cookie jar".

Personally I like the fact that the hospitals here have to compete with one another, because that means in the end I get better health care. Let the government take control of health care and the plague will back for sure amongst other things!!!

zbert, I'm not going to do any in depth argueing here but garnishing and fines are two different things. Are the " FINES " you mentioned collected every pay check ? When someone is garnished,the sum is collected on every pay period. Granted you might have already known this, but you seem to have bristled at the mention of Hillary in a possibly unfavorable light ? Obama and his statement that he will have "National Heath Care" within his first year in office is bogus as well, as a President cannot enact that alone. Could it be a coincidence that they are both Democrats ? No !

As far as the Massachusets plan, Romney wasn't trying to " SELL " that nationwide. So you'd have to consider the local voters and health care providers. Although this states legislators screwed the public resurrecting Nelson's fraudulent " NO FAULT PLAN " Mon vechicle insurance. The voters should have demanded a reforendum, and set Nelson to the curb as well !

And that's just how our government works...unless you are an illegal or are a big time supporter to their wealthy spending habits, then you will get the red carpet rolled out for yah!

Obama, Hillary And McCain are all talking about some kind of gorvenment supplied health care.
Although it has some success stories, Government health care is failing everywhere it is. There are many hospitals and doctors who are dropping out of government systems. They will only take patients who have nongovernment methods of payment because the government doesn't pay enough or on time.

Placing anything in the governments hands is giving them full control! Why give up our control because they talk big at first then ALWAYS slams you later, lead in for the kill! We don't need them to start gaining more and more control over us, that's like calling the sheep to the wolves! Once the people start becoming stupid and allow the government more control when they clearly can't take care of what they are suppose to already then we can hang any kind of freedom and United America decrease because of the people being sucked in slowly, step by step! Once it's gone...it's gone!

If you had the option to walk away, that is different.

"Who do you complain to" is a good question which applies to both private and public. Hospital administrators are good at ignoring and/or covering up problems.....maybe that is why they get paid the big bucks.

Most long term residents in an area are aware of the hospitals to go to and the ones to avoid, yet the government oversight continues to be lacking in the enforcement area. In addition the government often will bend to the desires of the medical establishment and not allow new hospitals to be built that would provide competition for some of those "undesirable" hospitals.

The terms "public and private" have become blurred in this country. Who is in charge? .....is a good question.