SIPEDO SEZ

Everyone has their personal standards on what language is appropriate and what is not. Fox has a list of words which is considered unacceptable here and they are automatically bleeped. Your list may be somewhat different. I don't like blocking anything. My fear is that censorship at the word level merely makes it easier for the PC police to continue to force changes in our language.

Sip, I've heard this saying all my life and it's more true today than ever. Only a pea-brain without the intelligence to carry on civil conversation resorts to profanity. But as always, you'll have some Einstein popping off about thier right to "free speech". That may apply to private settings. BUT, when you choose to vomit your profanity-laced tirades in a public forum, censoring is definately what your butt deserves...

There is no way to edit other people's posts
even if they are on your thread. You either
must delete the post, or allow all that's there.
There are more than enough words in the English
language to have a conversation without vulgarity.
Good topic.

Not necessarily, Eric. If the blogger is completely of topic, and merely "using" the host to post an insult, attack or rant against another blogger, ESPECIALLY IF profanity, vulgarity or vile innuendos are being used, OR or if they're "hijacking" the blog by
attempting to change its course, at the same time being offensive, the it is absolutely the prerogative of the host blogger to delete the troublemaker.

Using profanity is a hard habit to break. I think that a lot of people do not even realize that they are using it. I find profanity to be rude, especially in a public setting. I hear these words and look around and see small children or old people in a store hearing this profanity. It shows both a lack of intelligence and a lack of self respect.

I agree with you too Deb. What I mean is in some cases some delete a post because its against the opinion of the writer.

I don't believe in deleting anyones opinion, I may not agree with you, but I respect your right to voice your opinion...I would hope you also respect mine.....

So it has to be according to what YOU say is appropriate? Personally I find the words "horse manure" to be very offensive!!! Delete yourself immediately! I can't believe I wrote that filthy word! I'm going to go wash my hands off with soap!

I let the bleeper handle it. If Fox doesn't mind then neither do I.

I agree with Norty, but on the other hand Sipedo, I am sorry for getting wrapped up in a candy massacre on your blog..

As for what I was mentioning about you blog Beginning of the End... You're smart enough to figure it out... I showed you the scripture pointing 666 as a reference to King Solomon and gold monopolization... King Solomon practiced a form of mysitcism, or Jewish magic that is believed to be the same as the kabalah... A manuscript of the Kabalah was found in france by the templar knights and was the reason for the crusades... Freemasonry traces it's origins back to the templar knights and the construction of Solomon's Temple.. Higher Degree Mason's like many of our major political player's, presidents, commitee chairs, ceo's practice "the craft", satanic rituals from the kabalah. Lower degree masons up to the 30th Degree are told very little about the true mission of masonry... They are actually led to believe it is christian in nature... They have a vast network of surrogates, and a tighter network of 'believers'. The CFR is a surrogate which is leading us towards a global communist economy, and then authority.

Like I said, you can put it together yourself if you research it, and read the bible. Christ, and the prophets often repeat the phase in different forms "Let those who have an ear, listen" and Jesus, when talking about the parable of the sower tells them that EVERYTHING is taught in parables, so that it is clear as day to believers, but a stumbling block and source of confusion to the world. When you can stop taking everything in the bible as literal, and begin to see it as metaphorical, or maybe as a riddle I guess, it makes alot more sense. Christ also reiterates the sentiment from deuteronomy that everything true is backed by two or more witnesses. My point being
1) The story of creation, baptism, the last supper(communion), speaking in tongues and the other teachings of christ were parables.... God is not pleased by rituals and sacraments held holy by many "christian" religions. They miss the point completely.
2) The four accounts of the gospel we have in the canonized bible provide the reader with a legitimate way to clarify Christ's teaching, and if you are objective, you can discern the differences between the true and false. Many churches have structure and practices that come from the letters of Paul and are accepted as divine, but Paul said himself that many of his views were his own, and many of his recomendations directly contradict Jesus' teachings. Christ said to his disciples that all will fall away.