SIPEDO and YOU

I can think of no less than 554 people in Washington DC that should be executed.

No Trial.  No Jury.  No Second Chances.

They are responsible for the stripping of the rights of Americans.

They are responsible for the gouging of the pocketbooks of Americans.

They are responsible for the senseless deaths on our streets every year.

Now, here's the problem,  the American People Elected Most of Them!

So, it is imperative that if you want real change in this country, we must execute every politician in Washington DC, and all of the Supreme Court Justices.

Then when you're done doing that, every American voter needs to kill themselves , becasue:

They are responsible for the stripping of the rights of Americans.

They are responsible for the gouging of the pocketbooks of Americans.

They are responsible for the senseless deaths on our streets every year.

Now, do you feel better?

I have decided who I am going to vote for.  I have also decided that anybody who votes for Barack Obama is the enemy.  They are my personal enemy, they are enemies of the United States and are friends of terrorists.

There is no other explanation.  Barack Obama and Joe Biden are terrorists.

I have been re-learning some history, in particular, regarding the Declaration of Independence.

When you ask most people why the colonies separated from England, they list only 1 reason:  Taxation without Representation.

Did you know that there were 27 Reasons?  Taxation without Representation is a good answer, but it is an incomplete answer.  In fact, it is number 17 of the 27.

Some, when pressed will list Freedom of Religion.  That would be correct too, but still not complete.

I've cut and pasted the reasons below.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public Good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing Importance, unless suspended in their Operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the Accommodation of large Districts of People, unless those People would relinquish the Right of Representation in the Legislature, a Right inestimable to them, and formidable to Tyrants only.

He has called together Legislative Bodies at Places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the Depository of their public Records, for the sole Purpose of fatiguing them into Compliance with his Measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly Firmness his Invasions on the Rights of the People.

He has refused for a long Time, after such Dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of the Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the Dangers of Invasion from without, and the Convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the Population of these States; for that Purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their Migrations hither, and raising the Conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the Tenure of their Offices, and the Amount and Payment of their Salaries.

He has erected a Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harrass our People, and eat out their Substance.

He has kept among us, in Times of Peace, Standing Armies, without the consent of our Legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large Bodies of Armed Troops among us;

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from Punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all Parts of the World:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us, in many Cases, of the Benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended Offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an arbitrary Government, and enlarging its Boundaries, so as to render it at once an Example and fit Instrument for introducing the same absolute Rules into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with Power to legislate for us in all Cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our Seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our Towns, and destroyed the Lives of our People.

He is, at this Time, transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the Works of Death, Desolation, and Tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and Perfidy, scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous Ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized Nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the Executioners of their Friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic Insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the Inhabitants of our Frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known Rule of Warfare, is an undistinguished Destruction, of all Ages, Sexes and Conditions.

Now that you have read this, do you feel better informed?

It is important to know why Thomas Jefferson penned the DOI.

Sarah Palin recently was quoted as saying that Obama is palling around with terrorists.

That got me to thinking.  Of the two presidential candidates, which one would be more likely to pal around with terrorists?

Somehow I don't think it would be John McCain.  I don't think most in this country, democrat, republican or independent, etc...would think that.

However, when the name Barack Hussein Obama comes up, there is a great deal of skepticism.  Is it possible that his non practicing late muslim father had enough influence on his life to skew his principles into believing that Islam is not all that bad?

Here's the deal people, and this is a fact, no fiction, not made up, ALL OF ISLAM, wants non-muslims dead.  It IS in their holy book.  It is NOT a faerie tale.  It IS taught in ALL the mosques in the US and abroad.  They ARE in favor of total Sharia Law.  They ARE NOT our friends.

Now there are a lot of STUPID people out there right here in the US that would say otherwise.  Even GW Bush, who has been terribly misled has stated that he believes they are primarily a people of peace.  Nothing is further from the truth when it comes to matters of faith.  Islam, whether radical extremists, or silented muslims in this country secrety pray for the destruction of the United States government, and for the slaughter of the masses.  They ARE genocidal in their thoughts and practices.

So, if there is any doubt in your mind that Barack Obama has been influenced at all by anything Islamic, then you need to reconsider your vote.

I am not willing to take that chance.

The chances that Barack Obama is palling around with terrorists is a lot more believable than John McCain.

I'd rather have another Great Depression than risk a group like Islam to get any kind of a toe-hold in this country.  And if they do, I am more than willing to help smash the toe.

But, CHANCES ARE, there will be a lot of stupid people who will disagree with me.

“I think that it’s just a matter of people getting more familiar with me and knowing what my track record is.”   - Barack Obama in a WJLA interview in Virginia when asked about undecided voters.

Obama keeps talking about his "track record", but nobody seems to know what he is talking about.  He has not sponsored any significant legislation.  He has not had one original idea.  He gives a lot of lip service without showing his hand on any plans.  He says his plans are on his website, but when you go there, it is the same mumbo jumbo that both parties are espousing without any set plans.

The truth about Obama is this, he does not have a track record.

While I can't say I approve of everything that McCain or Biden has said or done, both of them DO have a track record.  Even Palin has a track record, however short.

But Barack Obama's track record is more of a LACK RECORD!

If you really want change in Washington, don't return anybody to office.  But that won't happen because there are too many stupid voters.  Yep!  Stupid would be the correct word.  Just let it roll off of your tongue  S T U P I D.  Kinda flows out of the mouth, it was meant to be said.

Would you expect to be promoted to chief executive officer of McDonalds after just 143 days on the job as a crewmember?

Would you expect to be named the next school superintendent fresh out of college and only 143 days in the classroom?

Would you expect a 5 year old to graduate from college after attending only 143 days of kindergarten?

Yeah, I know it's a gross comparison, but it's not that far off, because that is how long Barack Obama was on the job as US Sentator before announcing he was running for President.

Why would you vote for Barack Obama?  Some will detract and try to point out his time in the Illinois Legislature, but even that was riddled with failure.

Some are attacking Sarah Palin for her inexperience, but she has more experience as a CEO than Obama has.  In fact, Obama has ZERO experience as a CEO.

Don't get me wrong!  I would rather have my  pet chocolate Lab (Her name is Paczki) as president than McCain or Obama.

So, why Obama?  Why is Michigan leaning that way?

The only thing I can think of is stupidity.

Just as Granholm, who was a great Attorney General, was a poor choice for Governor of Michigan, so, Barack Obama, who did some good things in Chicago, is a poor choice for President.

As a former Michigan resident, I sit in my Florida home in the same situation as many in my home state.

The best thing that you can do as a voter is to vote against anybody awho has held office for more than 4 years.

I don't care what political party you identify with, or whether you're pro-life, pro-gun or pro-gay, quit voting for people who have done nothing to bring about change.

The only way to bring about change is to start voting the incumbents OUT.

You can start by voting OUT Dingell and Conyers and go from there.  They have done nothing substantial in the last 10 years in office.

That means that a vote for Obama OR McCain is a BAD idea.

Neither one will bring about change, I GUARANTEE IT!

It has been said before,  and it will be said again.

The best way, the only way we can get things FIXED in Washington is by doing one thing.

Vote against ALL indumbents.  They are not just PART of the problem.  They ARE the problem.

It is time to quit returning these crooks to office time and time again.

I don't care if they are pro-life, pro-abortion, fiscal or liberal conservative, vote them out!  They do not deserve a second chance.  They have blown it.

Obama and McCain keep saying how we need change, and they are right.  The only thing they don't get is that if they are serious about change, they would not be running.

A vote for anybody who is in office is just more proof that we have and apathetic, uneducated, ignorant populace that would rather sit on their hands and do nothing than take a risk, take a chance on REAL change.

You want CHANGE?  Then vote everyone OUT that is IN, and keep doing it election after election until those in office realize that they are NOT indespensible.

It would be great if all 435 House Members and the 34 Senate Seats this year sent ALL NEW People to those jobs.

Grant it, some idiotechnic is going to counter this with some anitquated hyperbole, but they would be wrong.

So, if the government "bails" out these banks, what happens to the people who still owe the same money to these banks?

I am not in favor of any government bail out, especially of AIG.

I am not in favor of any bailout for citizens either who are not blameless in this financial breakdown.

What is happening now was predicted when I was working in the mortgage business in 2005.  I saw it coming.  Many saw it coming.  Now that it is here, guess what?

The bailout is a bad idea.

Obama does horrible in interviews.  He scrambles for words, and is not a good debater.

I was on the forensic team in high school, and I know that I could beat Obama in any debate on any subject on any day.

He's just not quick enough, it takes him longer to form a complete sentence than it takes for John McCain to have a bowel movement. (ew!) He would lose the debate, whether it was McCain or some other person.

So all in all, McCain is doing Obama a big favor by saving him from some very embarrassing moments.

Not that Obama is stupid, but he is not a great debater.  

LOOK!! Up On the STAGE!  It's a Bleep!  It's a Blunder!  It's a Blooper!

He is neither Bleep, nor Blunder, Nor Blooper

He is TELEPROMPTERMAN.!!

It amazes me.  People who have never met in person, and who have no idea what a person is REALLY like except for the comments they place on these blogs, degrade each other.  Yes, I know some of you have met each other, but most have not.  I have not met anyone from these blogs.  Sometimes it is entertaining to see the banter that goes back and forth.  Other times it is just plain sad.

I'll be the first to admit, I appreciate a good debate.  I'll also admit, I sometimes make comments just to get a reaction (see my blog on Women Drivers).  I like shock value.  I once told my church to change their sign to SALOON - Happy Hour 10-11 a.m. every Sunday.  Come get drunk on the Spirit.

But why the insults?  It's one thing to debate an idea, and call an idea "stupid" or "ignorant" or "naive", but to make personal attacks on people based on some comments just because you don't agree with them?  If you're going to attack something, keep it relevant to the issue at hand.

After all, we're all part of the human race.  When it comes to human DNA, we are only separated by .2 percent, and along racial lines, the margin is much smaller than that, .012 percent.  We may all have different opinions about topics such as religion, politics and social issues, but we don't have to make personal bloggified assaults on people who just want to have a little fun, let off a little steam, and do it in a constructive way.

Now, I just know that somebody is going to respond with some jibberish that is going to tick somebody else off, and it will probably start all over again.

The truth is, we're all more alike that we would like to admit.  When we see faults in others, it is usually because we see ourselves in each other.  Like it or not, but, We are more alike than we are different.

Yet again, I have to blog about people who, while having fun on the blogs, choose to use language that most people consider inappropriate.

I once had a pastor, when presented with things that were blatantly wrong, referred to it as Horse Manure.

I was just monitoring one of my blog topics, and it said there were 29 comments.  I had to delete 12 of them.  3 of them as repeats, but 9 of them because I believe the language was used in a negative context.

Some in the blogging community weasle their way around using censored words.  I don't have to give you the list, we all know what they are.  They changed, added or omitted a letter to use their choice of words.

Am I guilty of the same acts in the past?  Absolutely!  Am I trying to change that?  I believe I already have.

The only word that I use, has a literal definition, but is also censored on FOX, begins with the letter B.  I would only use that in referring to a female canine, and only when and where appropriate.

What about you?

I find that I can be much more tactful and even insulting without using such words.  It makes much more sense to me to use words that actually describe what I am talking about rather than using words that are non-desript and profane.

Why does it seem that people have such restricted vocabularies that they cannot complete a thought without using some sort of profanity ?

I was once riding on a bus and heard some people talking in what appeared to be the language of profanity.  They began speaking to me, and I spoke clearly using well defined WORDS.  They told me I needed to expand my vocabulary, that my mind was limited.  I used words that made sense.  They used HORSE MANURE and nothing grew.

I just read that a recent poll conducted by Stanford University suggests that 40% of white American voters would not vote for a black person to be President.  Many of those white people are also democrats.  The poll indicates that it could make a difference of 1 to 1.5 percent come election time, enough for John McCain to win the presidency.

What do you think?  Of all the white people that you know, would you think that 40% of them, ragardless of their party affiliation, would either withhold their vote, or vote against a person because they were black?

In terms of this election, what if the roles were reversed, and a black person was running for President on, let's say, the Republican Ticket, would the poll be any different?

The poll also indicated that SOME white democrats view blacks as lazy, and that they are responsible for their own problems, and it is those democrats that would not vote for Barack Obama.

I don't have a feeling either way on this.  Maybe you do.

While I was shopping today, I got a phone call from my pastor.  We hadn't had a chance to chat in while, so he was just checking in.  Then I heard a shriek come through the phone, like that of the most horrible thing in the world.  He regained his composure and told me "RAY BOLTZ IS GAY".

I was like "get out of here", he was married and had 4 kids and was at the top of the Christian charts with multiple awards for many years.  I had just seen him singing "THE ANCHOR HOLDS" .

Unlike southern gospel singer KIRK TALLY, who sees being gay as "my cross to bear", Boltz has come out, and is doing a concert at the gay church in Washington this coming Sunday.

In an article published on Sept. 12 in the Washington Blade, Boltz said that he had come out to his family 4 years earlier.

This has been a blow to many people who revere the work, and the man that has given us such great songs such as THANK YOU, THE ANCHOR HOLDS, WATCH THE LAMB, I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE LAMB.

Boltz is working on a new album and resides in Fort Lauderdale.

Does this shake your faith a little?  Should churches quit using Ray's material?  Or is the message in the music able to be separated from the message of the man?

IS it just me?  I consider myself a safe driver.  It's even on my driver's license.

I have notices something, and some of you women are not going to like, and maybe you are not part of this group.  But if you are, I hope you change your ways.

Women + SUV's equals BAD IDEA.

More often than no, in my unscientific personal poll,  I notice that women are more careless about their driving when in an SUV than men.   Regardless of what the statistics are on ACCIDENTS.  They are aggressive, weaving in and out of traffic while talking on the cell phone, doing their nails, plucking their eyebrows and shaving their pits.  They do not pay attention to the road like they should.  They speed and follow way to close.

I know some will be offended by this, but I don't really care.  Women should not be allowed to have drivers licenses.  They should stay barefoot and pregnant.  After all, they ARE the weaker gender.