MyFox
 

rasguy24's Blog

by rasguy24 from Geneva Lakes Area

Last Post 42 days, 10 hours Ago


The Auto makers need another bail-out, Republicans don't want to throw more money into the void.They want the Auto makers to claim bankrupcy and restructure and then if they need help fine.

The Democrats are dead set against it. Why cause it would end Union contracts, they're the reason auto makers can't be competitive in the first place.

The unions own the democrats,  The dems are planning on taking away private voting on unions to let unions know who they need to muscle. It's no secret  how these unions work, legal organized crime if you ask me. To a point unions were good, but then the enormous benifits to auto makers employees has ran the auto makers into the ground.

The bailouts has accomplished nothing and now they don't even want to buy up the bad mortgages, that was the bail out whole purpose.

The government instead used the money to take steps towards socializing the Country.

How long will we wait and see before it's too late?
49 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 49
Page 1 of 3
1
Last
DiamondBuyer read my blog
Nov 12, 2008 | 5:32 PM

For the life of me I just can't understand why the Hell our government has to bail out these companies? Now the automakers see that and they want a piece of the action too. Let's just say that all of a sudden one of us see bad times and our little business starts failing. Is the government going to help us? Hell no they are going to say, You should have learned to work with your money a little bit better no figure out what you are going to do on your own!"

dangle read my blog view my photos
Nov 12, 2008 | 6:26 PM

"Why cause it would end Union contracts, they're the reason auto makers can't be competitive in the first place."

What does that mean? Competitive. Ok so WHO are buying the cars that the automakers are making? China? India? No Americans, well they were, until automakers claim that the wages are too high and they must move to a lower cost nation. People MAKING that decent wage that the "union" helped get were the ones buying the cars. No more good wages, no more car sales. You think China and Mexico are going to buy those cars? Think again.

rasguy24 read my blog
Nov 12, 2008 | 9:24 PM

basically it means if the union doesn't quit the stranglehold then there is no reason to bail them out let them fold.

dangle read my blog view my photos
Nov 12, 2008 | 9:49 PM

What stranglehold? In my recent experience with unions they are only trying to hold on to what they ALREADY have. Theyre not asking for astronomical raises or increases in insurance. Its usually a fight to keep what the worker ALREADY has. And the employer on the other hand wants to CUT wages or cut insurance coverage and hold "competition and lower wages" over their heads as a threat.

If the US goes down, the whole world goes down. Again, China and India, and Mexico will not buy our products like we do. So tell me. Who will buy that $30,000 car? GM does not look to the rich guy, and not the poor guy. And not to the ones living abroad MAKING their car. They look to the ones making enough to buy a $30,000 car. And $10/hour will not cut it.

rasguy24 read my blog
Nov 12, 2008 | 9:56 PM

It's a world economy, Clinton didn't fight for a fair playing feild when he signed the world trade agreement.

Either the Unions need to play ball or automakers need to go belly up.

dangle read my blog view my photos
Nov 12, 2008 | 10:11 PM

He only signed it, its actually been in the works since Nixon. Remember his "historic" visit to China? And how exactly should unions play ball? Agree to wage cuts? Agree to more work less pay? Because we will NEVER compete with foreign markets.

rasguy24 read my blog
Nov 12, 2008 | 11:38 PM

well then i guess they need to try a different product, move their companies to lower labor, or close their doors.

dangle read my blog view my photos
Nov 12, 2008 | 11:50 PM

Government can bail them out. If they dont, the government will have 1000's of people to "deal" with one way or another. Government know this. Sure, let auto companies go belly up I guess, now you have more people on welfare, more people taking government programs to help them out and so on. Either way the government will be paying like it or not.

Katbird read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 1:00 AM

I think the oil companies should merge with the auto industry. A match made in heaven.

Katbird read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 1:00 AM

I think the oil companies should merge with the auto industry. A match made in heaven.

Belial811 read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 2:25 AM

Hey everyone long time.
As a former union member and union official in the auto industry this sickens me.
Heres my take, the UAW have as much to do with this as the corporate fat cats.
The CEO's and upper management funneled huge bonuses into their pockets instead of pushing for better fuel efficient vehicles and better quality. They would literally wait to see what BMW, Volvo and the likes were doing before making a move instead of being the innovative they merely follow.
There is nothing worse than buying a new vehicle and 6 months the interior rattles like something you just bought from Fred Sanford.

All the while the unions stuck things in the collective bargaining that limited automation and streamlining of plants.
The average UAW worker earns roughly $74 an hour including benefits. Their assembly lines are stuck with one model of vehicle.

Honda, Nissan and Toyota in the U.S. of course make right around $50, and there facilities are more automated and they can make several models off one assembly line with relative easy change over,you cant compete with that, and obviously they aren't lacking quality. Hell the plant manager where I worked drove a Toyota whats that tell you.

So the big 3 sat back and let this happen to themselves. There was rampant greed from top to bottom. The thing that used to irk me to no end was election time. I was told to push the democrats, which I never did. I told them to stick it, these people all have minds let them make up their own. So with the UAW and unions in the dems pockets you can rest assured they will do all t

Belial811 read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 2:30 AM

Cut off.
They will make sure to keep the unions afloat even though they have as much to do with the failing of these companies.

I say let em fail, let new companies with fresh ideas and a decent plan take over. Let the strong survive and the weak die isn't that what capitalism is? as rasguy already stated we will be paying no matter how you look at it anyway.

Marine109 read my blog
Nov 13, 2008 | 6:03 AM

The union is not destroying the auto makers. They nagotiated a deal and the company agreed.

Should the union sit down and renagotiante?
YES!!!!!!

Something is better than nothing. If they stand back and watch the ship sink then every auto worker will get what they deserve; unemployment and a busted union.

Katbird read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 9:42 AM

I wonder why aren't they forced to get rid of their larger assests to save the sinking ship?
If you're on a boat you look to throw overboard something that's heavy. Maybe they don't need so many high paid paperpushers? Maybe they don't need big golden buildings to house their top brass? Maybe the people in the big buildings could take paycuts? If I was running a business and it was failing, I wouldn't fire my blue collar workers. I would try to cut the extravagances and take a load off of the company. You then change production to suit sales and cut your losses. Sell those SUVs at a very discounted price and take a loss, but dump the garbage. Start production of fuel efficient vehicles at affordable prices to appeal to the public.
Again, it's drastic change that is needed and greed holds them back abd their fear of change.
The American public should not be forced to pay for their stupidity and bad judgement and then not get back something from the companies, such as a good faith show by cutting back and doing things to make the company work well. We have been slapped in the face by AIG and other companies in the bailout. I am tired of the American public having this thrown in our faces and being treated like we're stupid.

dangle read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 10:47 AM

Nicely put. And not only that, like you said Kat, the PUBLIC will pay for the stupidity. Now youll what possibly millions theyre saying? that will be unemployed, in a low job market. They will have a hard time paying bills, therefore not buy ANY luxury items, travel and so on. But you know what? Again! The guys on top wont struggle with their mortgages. The guys on top wont stop that trip to the Cayman Islands and so on.

And BTW Bel...."as rasguy already stated we will be paying no matter how you look at it anyway." Was my comment not his....for the record.

Katbird read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 11:10 AM

That's why I said let the oil companies bail them out. They made record profits for the last four quarters, each time beating the last. It would be a good investment for them. How well would it serve the public? Not sure on that one.
I think it's better than us bailing them out with imaginary money. The only backing to these bailout loans are our backs working to pay them. Why are we working to support these piggies?

Have you seen the little piggies
Crawling in the dirt?
And for all the little piggies
Life is getting worse
Always having dirt to play around in

Have you seen the bigger piggies
In their starched white shirts?
You will find the bigger piggies
Stirring up the dirt
Always have clean shirts to play around in

In their styes with all their backing
They don't care what goes on around
In their eyes there's something lacking
What they need's a damn good whacking

Everywhere there's lots of piggies
Living piggy lives
You can see them out for dinner
With their piggy wives
Clutching forks and knives to eat their bacon

Belial811 read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 11:15 AM

I agree Kat. Sorry Dangle it was late and my eyes were tired.

volkd read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 12:27 PM

Is there a plan at the Big 3 to stop the bleeding ?? They have been losing money for some time and now they are about out. So if we give them some more money, how long before they are out again. Without a plan to recover, throwing money at the problem is stupid.

F0x6Fan read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 12:42 PM

Everybody practically needs help with a financial bailout.....thanks to your man Dubya!

The average American could use a cool ten grand to get back on track.

volkd read my blog view my photos
Nov 13, 2008 | 3:57 PM

Need a cool ten grand, get a second job. Where is the entitlement coming from ? As far as Dubya is concerned you should be thanking him for one thing, your head is still attached to your neck and no more buildings have fallen.

Page 1 of 3
1
Last


Write your comment below:




rasguy24

Freedom Lost

Member Since: 2/3/2008