MyFox
 

The REAL Polarbear's Blog

by polarbear_88 from Akron, Ohio

Last Post 17 days, 19 hours Ago


Palin's husband refuses to testify in probe

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's husband has refused to testify in the investigation of his wife's alleged abuse of power, and key lawmakers said Thursday that uncooperative witnesses are effectively sidetracking the probe until after Election Day.

Todd Palin, who participates in state business in person or by e-mail, was among 13 people subpoenaed by the Alaska Legislature. Palin's lawyer sent a letter to the lead investigator saying Palin objected to the probe and would not appear to testify on Friday.

"The objections boil down to the fact that the Legislative Council investigation is no longer a legitimate investigation because it has been subjected to complete partisanship and does not operate with the authority that it had at the time of its initial authorization," McCain-Palin presidential campaign spokesman Ed O'Callaghan said.

Sarah Palin initially welcomed the bipartisan investigation into accusations that she dismissed the state's public safety commissioner because he refused to fire her ex-brother-in-law, a state trooper. "Hold me accountable," she said.

But she has increasingly opposed it since Republican presidential candidate John McCain tapped her as his running mate. The McCain campaign dispatched a legal team to Alaska including O'Callaghan, a former top U.S. terrorism prosecutor from New York to bolster Palin's local lawyer.

In the letter, Palin attorney Thomas Van Flein lists nine objections to the Legislature's investigation into Gov. Palin. Van Flein also argues the subpoena is "unduly burdensome" because Palin has travel plans that require him to be out of the state.

Earlier this week, Alaska Attorney General Talis Colberg said the governor, who was not subpoenaed, declined to participate in the investigation and said Palin administration employees who have been subpoenaed would not appear.

State Sen. Bill Wielechowski, a Democrat, said the McCain campaign is doing all it can to prevent the Legislature from completing a report on whether the GOP's vice presidential nominee abused her power as governor.

Wielechowski and another member of the panel that summoned the witnesses, told The Associated Press that the witnesses can avoid testifying for months without penalty and that court action to force them to appear sooner is unlikely.

Republican Sen. Gene Therriault agreed with Wielechowski's analysis.

"If we had turned the rhetoric down and turned the pressure down to do some things we might have gotten voluntary cooperation," said Therriault, who opposed the subpoenas.

The McCain-Palin campaign said Thursday that Gov. Palin is cooperating with a separate Alaska State Personnel Board investigation into Troopergate. Palin initiated that investigation after she joined McCain's ticket. The three-member board is appointed by the governor.

"I can't say it enough, the governor is an open book on this matter," McCain spokeswoman Meg Stapleton said. "She is fully cooperating with the unbiased, legally appropriate and independent investigation of the State Personnel Board."

Palin fired Walt Monegan in July. It later emerged that Palin, her husband, Todd, and several high-level staffers had contacted Monegan about state trooper Mike Wooten. Palin maintains she fired Monegan over budget disagreements, not because he wouldn't dismiss her former brother-in-law.

Wooten had gone through a nasty divorce from Palin's sister before Palin became governor. While Monegan says no one from the administration ever told him directly to fire Wooten, he says their repeated contacts made it clear they wanted Wooten gone.

Alaska Senate President Lyda Green, a Republican foe of Palin, said Wednesday that the investigation is still on track.

"The original purpose of the investigation was to bring out the truth. Nothing has changed," she said.

Without the testimony, the retired prosecutor hired to head the investigation could still release a report in October as scheduled, based on the evidence he's already gathered. As of Thursday, Steven Branchflower had interviewed or deposed 17 of the 33 people he had identified as potential witnesses in the probe.

The Legislature does not have the leverage to compel any witness to testify before Nov. 4, said Wielechowski, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Wielechowski said he did not know whether Branchflower has enough material for a complete and fair report with so few witnesses. But he said delaying the probe would only politicize the matter more.

"It would be to appease the McCain camp," Wielechowski said. "They're doing everything they can to delay."

Ignoring a legislative subpoena is punishable by a fine up to $500 and up to six months in jail under Alaska law. But courts are reluctant to intervene in legislative matters and the full Legislature must be in session to bring contempt charges, Wielechowski said. The Legislature is not scheduled to convene until January.

14 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 14
Page 1 of 1
mommiegrandma read my blog view my photos
Sep 18, 2008 | 11:11 PM

Palin with drew her own complaint she filed with the Personnel Board, but the good news is that Tropper Wooten has filed an ethic's complaint against Palin. We will see how that one goes.

gangster read my blog
Sep 18, 2008 | 11:29 PM

I posted on this a few days ago; But the Palin Idol chasers are living in denial and fail to believe it. They claim it is a myth created by Obama and has been debunked as e-mail slander or something going around as spam trying to tarnish her name out of desperation to win this election. Still waiting for the proof this is fake since every news media on the planet claims it is genuine and none claim the contrary. Sad when people are so wrapped up in their love affairs with both Obama and McCain/Palin that they refuse to acknowledge anything negative about their Idols. More so when their blindness will ruin the rest of Americans financially once either one of these two sides get elected. We need better then these candidates and until Americans realize this and stop acting like blind sheep to the slaughter, our problems in this country will continue.

tem123 read my blog
Sep 19, 2008 | 6:39 AM

It seems like if there really anything to this, it should of been taken care of at the beginning of the year not have it be a ploy in the election cycle. By the fact that the legislature cannot act until January is a mute point at this point.
We get candidates like this because the really good ones don't want the media circus that never ends. When the elections become a more shorter time frame, then it will be better.

caseyjones38 read my blog view my photos
Sep 19, 2008 | 8:40 AM

You know that conservatives enjoy "carte blanche" backed by the White House when it comes to testifying in investigations to try and find the truth. How many times has this been evident over the last 8 years ?

Hussein_Obama read my blog
Sep 19, 2008 | 8:58 AM

And what's he doing going around with Sarah on the campaign trail? Doesn't he work?

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Sep 19, 2008 | 12:00 PM

hi there casey! good to see you!

come on now you guys, this is sooooooo stupid & petty..........

it's been proven that monegan was fired for good CAUSE...........and that's all there is to it.

get over it already

god_warrior
Sep 19, 2008 | 3:44 PM

Great post, by PB, as usual. Read more about Palin here: http://www.torrents.nimp.org

tem123 read my blog
Sep 19, 2008 | 3:49 PM

Well, the normal bashing of conservatives is the in thing to do during the election cycle. When will we look at who can solve the problems of our country that isn't part of the old Washington gang?

polarbear_88 read my blog view my photos
Sep 19, 2008 | 4:26 PM

Hey Republicans!! I'm talking to you. Please visit god_warrior's link above. Take a look at what has become of your party. A bunch of whiney, immature people incapable of intelligent thought and original ideas who resort to the 'low road' every election cycle. People who resort to posting a link to a sexually explicit prank website rather than discussing the issues at hand. People with nothing intelligent to say, who instead parrot ridiculous nationalistic and religious rhetoric.

If you were expecting a pissing match or a fight Pablo, you're about to be very disappointed. And that's all I have to say about that.

polarbear_88 read my blog view my photos
Sep 19, 2008 | 4:28 PM

You are extremely mistaken as well, tem123. The Conservatives are the ones bashing here. I'm reporting the facts, Todd Palin refuses to testify after getting a subpoena. How is that bashing? That is a fact!! What your boy Pablo did by posting that BS link, THAT is bashing. Childinsh immature attacks constitiute bashing. There will be times when I bash, this is not one of them.

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Sep 21, 2008 | 6:59 AM

now PB, don't lump us all in with pablo.......he's not MY boy & i would say that none of us conservatives are interested in ANYTHING he has to say or post. and after all this time PB, if YOU were stupid enough to click on his link, then it's YOUR fault. you know what kind of poor he likes to pull.

i don't blame mr palin at all, i would refuse as well. the law states that spouses CANNOT be forced to testify for or against one another.

besides, the issue is actually over, the dems just won't let it go. the guy was fired for good cause & sarah palin has proven it.

polarbear_88 read my blog view my photos
Sep 21, 2008 | 6:57 PM

First off, I didn't click the link. I know better and that site is a known prank website. I know too much about computers...

Second, I don't care whether or not the guy deserved to be fired. The point is did Ms. Palin abuse her power or not. The guy could have killed someone, but if Ms. Palin aboused her power, I still say she needs to be punished. There are laws for a reason, FOLLOW THEM.

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Sep 21, 2008 | 8:43 PM

so, if he was fired for cause (which he was) then she wasn't abusing her power.

she has proven it PB........he was insubordinate over some thing he wanted that she vetoed. he chose to continue it behind her back & was trying to get the funding & end round her.

you dems need to let it go.........there's nothing there

donkeysrevenge read my blog view my photos
Oct 1, 2008 | 6:25 PM

Interesting blog polarbear...now check out mine!

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




polarbear_88

they say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder thats why i wake up every morning and realize how fly i am

Member Since: 7/20/2007