MyFox
 

movealready's Blog

by movealready

Last Post 4 hours Ago


Hmmmm a Democrat makes some layoffs, I guess that 's a kinder, friendlier way to not have to raise your taxes. Hey wait one moment.....if I pay the same amount of taxes and the government "downsizes" is this not the same as a tax increase. Following that thought, people out of work means people on social programs, right where the Democrats want you,dependent on them.   On the other hand, if the Democrats of Philadelphia would cut corporate taxes and encourage new business to come to Philadelphia, would these new businesses bring in more tax revenue and jobs........nah, too Republican of a concept.  In the name of helping urban citizens, they would rather keep taxes high, slash jobs sending people to unemployment and call it a good days work. Yeah, this Obama thing is going to be  great.
13 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 13
Page 1 of 1
stylegal read my blog view my photos
Nov 6, 2008 | 4:13 PM

Move, he could save $90K if he would get rid of Latrice Bryant. They should also investigate Wilson Goode Jr. as I bet there is a bunch of things they could get on him (misappropriation of funds)
BTW how did he pay for the trip to Jamaica for him and Bryant to do the horizontal cha-cha for work?????
Was that trip expensed as a business trip?

Also Councilman Bill Green was asked about this relationship, and he thought it OK, I guess Green should be watched closely too.

movealready read my blog
Nov 6, 2008 | 6:29 PM

You are absolutely right. I'm sure this is (somehow) the fault of the city's Republican Party. Does Philadelphia even have a Republican Party?
Closing so many pools for the "entitled ones" and a highering freeze on the police Dept. is sure to help with Philadelphia's crime problem. I find it interesting, Philadelphia is slashing programs everywhere, yet they beg the Federal Government for a "bailout". I wonder why Nutter believes that rural Pennsylvanians/Americans should further subsidies these sanctuary cities. Our taxes are going to go up enough without the Feds redistrubing our money further. Of course, whats a billion here or there as long as the "haves" are footing the bill. When that cash cow goes dry, and it will, I suppose the poor will be only too happy to help us???

Gen_Public read my blog
Nov 6, 2008 | 7:37 PM

Do you think it was just chance that the mayor waited until after Obama was elected to announce the cuts? How do you think the Democrats would have done in the election if he made this announcement a few days ago? You know they didn't dream all this up in 1 day. All of this was planned. They said that Pennsylvania was critical and this probably would have made a difference in the turnout. Do you think Obama told him to wait while he was touring Philly? I think this is called 'bait and switch'.

movealready read my blog
Nov 6, 2008 | 7:54 PM

that was no coincedence.

stylegal read my blog view my photos
Nov 6, 2008 | 9:55 PM

Same thing Bloomberg did, wait until after election day.
I think if they would have told them on Monday, then their union leaders couldn't pressure them into voting for "the one"

reshef read my blog
Nov 7, 2008 | 9:52 AM

I am from overseas but visit Philly frequently and look at the situation from te outside and I think the issues that you have today started well before th financial situation the USA is in. The financial downturn is obviously one reason that the city looks the way it does, but lets look at the realities of life. This situation is not new. The previous administration had something to do with this. As the 5th largest city in the USA, even when people paid taxes and the city was in surplus, rubbish wasn't collected, streets are filthy, public transport wasn't running on time and issues that should have been paid for by peoples taxes weren't being done. However, it is now time to find answers and ways to overcome these issues. Thereare several things that could be done to overcome the financial problems. I am sure that the citizens of this great city will band together if the right stimulus is given.

stylegal read my blog view my photos
Nov 7, 2008 | 10:25 AM

reshef only a percentage of people paid the taxes, as there is a lot of public housing, and section 8 housing (thanks to Rep. Allison Schwartz). So there are many who are not contributing to the tax base in this city. Then you have a do-nothing city council who cheat the tax payers (Wilson Goode Jr and his squeeze with a work-when-I-feel-like-it-but-make-$90K Latrice Bryant), then you have (make excuses for his fellow representatives in city council Bill Green)and these are some of the reasons that this budget is a mess.
Why doesn't Mayor Nutter hold them accountable?

movealready read my blog
Nov 7, 2008 | 11:11 AM

The American Federal Government (read as Bush Administration) has nothing to do with the financial situation the city of Philadelphia finds itself. Yes, the economy has had a downturn. That has an effect on tax revenue. Bottom line, you don't find yourself 650 million in the hole overnight. Why were the Democratic leadership hiding their financial situation...oh I forgot the Obama factor.
Democrat are reliable when it comes to economics, their answer is tax,tax,tax. That type of economic policy drives businesses away and reduces tax revenue. Remove heavy tax burden and business thrives and consequently tax revenue increases dramatically (see Ronald Reagan economic policies). Democrats don't care about money, they care about control. With control they can implement socialist policies and control money,business and the masses. The Democratic leadership of Philadelphia and Philadelphia's City council is where the buck stops with regard to fiscal responsibility. Like typical Democrats, they spend,spend,spend. Then when the bill comes due they expect others to foot the bill.....read as the tax payers of all America.
If you want to see a debtor nation, just see what happens to America under Obama's leadership.

fishtownsharon read my blog
Nov 7, 2008 | 12:24 PM

Lots of good points, folks. Plenty for me to think about.

Reshef, you're right when you point out this isn't a new problem. Previous administrations have had a hand in it; unfortunately those administrations were Democrat-controlled, and in turn they've given the whole party a bad rap.

Style, you're right too when you say the mayor should hold people accountable. Personally I think before he goes cutting anything he should do a thorough audit of each and every city department, down to the level of individual workers if necessary, and see where things are getting squandered. I wouldn't be surprised if that would uncover some more employees with the same work ethic as Latrice and Wilson Jr. I know I may sound like a broken record because I said the same thing about the Congressional bailout, but why should those departments who DID manage their funds responsibly have to pay the price?

fishtownsharon read my blog
Nov 7, 2008 | 12:41 PM

Move...oh man, I'm going to get blasted for this but I'm gonna say it anyway... At this point what does it matter whose fault it is? I'll agree someone certainly should be held accountable, and it just so happens the Dems have had control through the past administrations. But is it really fair to say that they're the problem when we have no way of knowing for sure that a Republican administration wouldn't have gotten us to a similar point?

I think it says something about Mayor Nutter when he's not only acknowledging there is a problem but trying to fix it before it gets even worse.

As for cutting departments, see my earlier comment about accountability and making better selections. No, cutting the police force isn't going to help cut crime; but neither, for that matter, is cutting after-school programs and putting kids out on the streets. No one is going to win out of this. But with the right political maneuvers they could soften the blow.

As for your initial comment, about what defines a tax increase...I have to give that some more ponderance.

movealready read my blog
Nov 7, 2008 | 3:20 PM

Fish,
Until we see a Republican government in charge in Philadelphia, don't you think it's uncharitable to assume Republicans would have gotten Philadelphia in the same position (eventhough I kinda agree).
Remember, when they ask for a Federal bailout, that means more taxes for you and I. Don't you think these Democratic lead Sanctuary City's should be more careful with our tax dollars....their entitlements. Are we not paying enough for their social programs? The Democrats could certianly do more to be more efficient.

fishtownsharon read my blog
Nov 7, 2008 | 3:32 PM

Don't you think it's stereotypical to assume that only Democrats would be stupid enough to get us in this position to begin with?

I agree that leaders - not just Democrats but also Republicans, Independents, Liberatarians, and any other political group out there - should be more careful with our money. And upon review of party records/party-led administrations I'm sure there's room for more efficiency.

Either way, and even though he's a Dem, you have to give Nutter some credit for nipping this in the bud now before it gets worse. In a strange sense I feel he's almost taking responsibility for what's happened, being as he was a councilman for so long and no doubt contributed to this mess. But still, give him some props...no matter what the end result will be for we the people.

akapatrick read my blog
Nov 8, 2008 | 7:10 PM

Nutter's cuts seem to be coming under the Bush administration. Let's just blame Bush.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




movealready

Can you smell that Socialist breeze blowing our way?

Member Since: 4/17/2007