dhw1949's Blog

I've read this in the NRA magazine "Freedom 1st". As I have said many times in the past, I do not trust anyone who has a mind to take everyone's gun away from them. This does nothing for safety as the only one's that are affected our the law abiding citizens. The most dangerous and deadliest places to be are the so called "Gun Free" zones for the exact same reason. Criminals do not respect or obey gun laws and all these laws do is make an honest citizen prone to being taken advantage of. If any of these 10 point "Changes" go into effect, watch the crime rate sky rocket. That's exactly what is happening in Australia, England and Canada where gun ownership is illegal or nearly illegal (except by criminals).

They'll have to track me deep into the Rockies to get my firearms! Hope they know what bear traps look like!

Only a small percentage of gun related deaths are by strangers of the victim.
The gun related death will most likely be:

1.a suicide
2.the gun owner murdering a friend/family member
3. a family member/friend murdering the gun owner

I believe the right to bear arms should be protected. Government interference would only create a new class of criminals- gun owners who refuse to give up their arms.

If something like this did take effect, would you be willing to give up your firearms? Or would be willing to be considered a criminal, potentially facing jail-time?

Is that because you will refuse to give up your guns, thus becoming an outlaw?

Or do you mean that you gave up yours and the ones who have guns are the non-law abiding dregs of society?

dhw1949 I am with you all the way..."from my cold dead hands they will pry away my glock."

I would rather be considered a criminal by my goverment and own a gun, then be a victim or worse dead, and I will defend my family in the very same manor.

Count me in as a "future criminal" because I will NEVER surrender my firearms!
dhw, no normal thinking person would vote for Obama. The problem is that we have allowed abnormal thinking people to reproduce like rabbits, and unfortunately they are allowed to vote.

Ruby Ridge, Man!!

The problem, as I see it, is the lack of respect for the weapons. Some people should not own weapons. Just like some people should not have children. Just because you can own a weapon or have a child, does not mean it is a good idea.

Bob- "no normal thinking person would vote for Obama..." Apparently, your definition of normal needs to be redefined. For example, there is a "married" gay couple on my street, who are armed to the teeth. They feel the need to arm themselves to protect themselves from "bigots who want to kill them" because of their lifestyle. They are constantly asking me if I want to go to the range with them. And they are Republicans!!! Add that to your normal definition.

senor,I never said there weren't abnormal people that vote Republican.
I said no normal person would vote for Obama.

How about we spread the word about this dark-skinned Alfred E. Newman look-alike's assinine, anti-constitutional agenda? That's what this blog was about, but getting side-tracked doesn't bother me.
BOB--better dead than Bubba'd?
senor--better cave in than be Bubba'd?