bootsykowan's Blog

Bootsy...I have 2 beautiful labs that I adore..but they are like unruly children. Why would shopping centers want to sponsor "doggie day camps"? If you have doggies they need to be at home...a lot of people are not into stepping into poop in parking lots and smelling dogs. If you want to take your dogs to "camp" call the people who get PAID to run camps and take care of your pups. When I go shopping, I just want to get into and out of the stores...then go home and love on my pups who have spent the time I was shopping, napping.

MILLIONAIRE BRAIN'z "evolve" ??? Have you $een tho$e $olar-powered univer$al window-vent$ ?

Before tho$e, the WORLD NEED$ $olar-powered water-pump$ for AFRIcKKKa. Bad JOKE, but .... why hurt other life ? GOODne$$ iz watching from OUR in$idez and AIN'T ALWAY'z HAPPY

Tru$t MY dog. It $marte$t biter. HaHaHA, NOT. NEVER TRU$T MAN TRAINED $Cared-i-malz. A good dog readz mindz better than WE do. $mell he i$ bad, buddy ??? Tru$t your DOG'z @ttitude, maybe. Good 50/50 gue$$tim@te

Boots,has anyone ever bothered to point out to you the fact that PETA hates pet owners?Just because you choose to keep a dog as a slave for your own amusement they would line you up against the wall and shoot you.Or did you not know that?

$ee a "pet" in a HOT car ? OUR LOCAL Lawz do NOT allow that. No GOOD $oul can @nd re@lly be GOOD $oul. Even cat $tew or dog "deluxe" de$erve$ compa$$ion..... and maybe Ketchup & Lemon&Pepper $ea$oning. What'z DIFFERENT ? Bulling a COW to make Mommy Milk or fake love to make $f$o$o$d$ r ju$t food'z $$$$ cou$IN. Mi$$Taked Cou$IN Mi$$Take. $he'z $weet.
..... PAIN iz pain iz PAIN. What do YOU DREAM ? Your $elf-made future ??? Yoda $@id 'd@ future iz @lw@y'$ ch@nging ..... but energy iz energy iz energy, not feelingz. Tho$e energie$ are Tooooo deep for U$ humanz to comprehend in thi$ exi$tance.

i'm tryin' to $t@y po$itive. DO NOT TRU$T..... Mi$$Take$ happen ...... but not animal cruelty allowed. Hate mou$e controllerz ??? Call 1-900-Get-A-Dog or 1-888-Kil-Kity

"you" includes the veterinarians too. At least they can't sue me for free speech, yet. The vets are terrified of them. I love giving PETA press in all matters of animals.

"PETA has you right where they want you."

We can have PETA right where we want PETA. It's a poor rule that doesn't work both ways. Just exactly like an InterLinear Qur'an: Arabic2Hebrew. Which then would be followed by an Arabic cdrom The Trope Trainer.

So then NIMH will also manage PETA after we get that capability to RV our dogs in dog and auto safety. PETA will become our slaves.

Boots said "Many times I don't research and just rely on instinct because actions speak louder than words"


O.K. then,how loud do these words speak?

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/

How about these:

“I don’t use the word 'pet.' I think it’s speciesist language. I prefer 'companion animal.' For one thing, we would no longer allow breeding. People could not create different breeds. There would be no pet shops. If people had companion animals in their homes, those animals would have to be refugees from the animal shelters and the streets. You would have a protective relationship with them just as you would with an orphaned child. But as the surplus of cats and dogs (artificially engineered by centuries of forced breeding) declined, eventually companion animals would be phased out, and we would return to a more symbiotic relationship – enjoyment at a distance.”
— The Harper's Forum Book, Jack Hitt, ed., 1989, p.223

“In the end, I think it would be lovely if we stopped this whole notion of pets altogether.”
— PETA quote in Newsday article

“The bottom line is that people don't have the right to manipulate or to breed dogs and cats... If people want toys, they should buy inanimate objects. If they want companionship, they should seek it with their own kind.”
— PETA quote from Animals magazine

“One day, we would like an end to pet shops and the breeding of animals. [Dogs] would pursue their natural lives in the wild ... they would have full lives, not wasting at home for someone to come home in the evening and pet them and then sit there and watch TV.”
— P

Amen, in general, Mount..., except 4 this:

pet (1)
"tamed animal," originally Scot. and northern England dial., of unknown origin. Sense of "indulged child" (1508) is recorded slightly earlier than that of "animal kept as a favorite" (1539), but the latter may be the primary meaning. Probably associated with or influenced by petty. The verb is 1629 meaning "treat as a pet;" the sense of "to stroke" is first found 1818. Slang sense of "kiss and caress" is from 1920 (implied in petting, in F. Scott Fitzgerald). Teacher's pet is attested from 1914.

So I don't see the difference between "pet" and "companion". We "pet" each other equally with mutual trust?