Apr 5, 2008 | 8:04 AM
Category:
Political

"Security firm Blackwater has had its contract to protect US
diplomats in Iraq extended, as an FBI probe into the killing of 17
Iraqis continues."
More...
Mar 14, 2008 | 7:36 PM
Category:
Political
"Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Friday denounced
inflammatory remarks from his pastor, who has railed against the United
States and accused its leaders of bringing on the Sept. 11 attacks by
spreading terrorism." Full article.
Want proof that the U.S. DOES promote terrorism?
See Zeitgeist: The Movie (complete, streamed) here. 2 hr 3 min.
Part 1: Religion
Part 2: 9/11
Part 3: The Fed and the U.S. Banking cartel
~Peace
Mar 7, 2008 | 1:28 PM
Category:
Political
Should Michigan and Florida's 313 delegates now
be allowed to sit?
No. Not without re-caucus at the expense of the Democratic Party.
Though I am a staunch
supporter of Hillary Clinton, I am disappointed to learn that she wants (now)
to include Michigan and Florida's delegates. Yes, I am clearly hopeful
that she will win and become our next president. However, the Democratic Party was the entity that disallowed (penalized) Michigan and Florida
by disallowing their 313 delegates to sit because they held their caucuses
early. It was not a personal decision on her part to further her campaign.
I am hopeful that she, like
Barack Obama, will agree to do as the Democratic
Party has agreed, forget that the delegates exist (sorry delegates) and either
re-caucus at the Party’s expense or just let those delegates go and get on with
running a good, clean campaign as before - even if it means neither candidate
will have the required delegates to secure their nomination by the Democratic
Party.
~Peace
Mar 4, 2008 | 4:11 PM
Category:
News
Is it true you can buy a unit online that will allow you to modify your existing car ($450), truck ($650), or big rig ($1000) to use water in conjunction with gasoline to significantly increase your gas mileage? Is it true you can decrease your carbon footprint (emissions) by using a water gas mix? Is it true that a WATER GAS HYBRID is even MORE ECO-FRIENDLY than an ELECTRIC GAS HYBRID?
YES!! It is for real!! See the Fox 26 News video here.
I can think of nothing better to spend my Income Tax Rebate check, or my Economic Stimulus check on than this unit. It will help defer the rising cost of a tank of gasoline due to the steep rise in the price of a barrel of oil (which OPEC has clearly stated they are not trying to reduce at this time).
- Actual Products and answers to your questions here.
- Connect to a dealer NEAR YOU here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
100% Money-back guaranty...
"100% Money-Back Satisfaction Guarantee: All of our products are covered by our 100% Money-Back Satisfaction Guarantee..."
What's required...
"All MagDrive HHO gens are "HYBRID FUEL UNITS" meaning they are to be used in conjuction with your vehicles normal fuel.
Take Note: This process is not perpetual motion, over unity or zero point energy.
The introduction of a superior supplemental fuel when combined with fossil fuel increases the performance, horse power and
over all operation of an internal combustion engine, while simultaneously lowering the emissions and operating
temperature of the engine and extending the oil change and tune up period requirements."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Peace
Mar 3, 2008 | 6:58 PM
Category:
Political
Obama
denies assuring Canada on NAFTA

Click on
pic for full article.
"Barack Obama
said Monday that his campaign never gave Canada back-channel assurances that
his harsh words about the North American Free Trade Agreement were for political
show — despite the disclosure of a Canadian memo indicating otherwise."
Click pic for full article.
~~~~~~
In a related
article:
"America's
too vain, and he appeals to America's sense of vanity," Mos
Def told Rolling Stone. "It's the A & R guy in me . . .
when I saw him on the cover of Men's Vogue, I said, 'This guy's gonna
win because he looks good.' So, the best-looking guy for the job is a black
guy. I'm cool with that. People also want a rock-star quality to the president,
which he has." Click link above for complete article.
Mar 3, 2008 | 12:49 PM
Category:
Political
Hillary relaxes with longtime friends Mary Steenbergen and Ted Danson while fielding questions from the press.

Click on pic for video stream 3 min 46 sec.
Mar 1, 2008 | 1:41 PM
Category:
Political
Does Experience Matter in a President?
"A story is often told at times like this - times when American voters
are choosing among candidates richly seasoned with political experience
and those who are less experienced but perhaps more exciting
alternatives. Once upon a time, the torch was passed to a new
generation of Americans, and a charismatic young President, gifted as a
speechmaker but little tested as an executive, was finding his way
through his first 100 days. On Day 85, he stumbled, and the result ..."
[...]
"When Americans pass over the best-credentialed candidates because their
heart or their gut leads them elsewhere, they are only reflecting a
visceral understanding that the presidency involves tests unlike all
others. They are, perhaps, seeking the ineffable quality the writer Katherine Anne Porter
had in mind when she defined experience as "the truth that finally
overtakes you." An ideal President is both ruthless and compassionate,
visionary and pragmatic, cunning and honest, patient and bold,
combining the eloquence of a psalmist with the timing of a jungle cat.
Not exactly the sort of data you can find on a rÉsumÉ."
More
Mar 1, 2008 | 12:53 PM
Category:
Political
Black
delegates under pressure to switch to Obama

Streaming video: 5 min 38 sec
Click on pic to follow link.
For the Article, please click this link.
Feb 29, 2008 | 5:17 PM
Category:
Political

Click here for the complete video stream.6 min. 56 sec.
Feb 29, 2008 | 12:22 PM
Category:
Entertainment
Mr. Kolpan asked what we
might 'invent' if given the chance. What follows is not so much an invention
as just an idea I wanted to share...here goes:

Venice, Italy
Instead of building and re-building New Orleans, why don't we intentionally
build it to be a water city? I mean, Venice wasn't built to be a water city
on purpose, but it has withstood the test of time as such. Perhaps we could
redesign New Orleans to be a city who is in harmony (no pun intended) with the
water that surrounds it. New Orleans could embrace the influx of water during
storm surges, and hurricanes by becoming a city ON the water instead of a city
UNDER the water when tragedy strikes. It would be best, in my opinion, to have
the city rebuilt on floating structures since we are keenly aware that the force
of the water will move the land surface below making pylons a poor choice. Yes,
the city may be on stilts, but the stilts' moorings would move with the shifting
silt. (N.O. is, after all, built on a delta...)
The city could be designed with the same "streets" in mind but instead
of the streets being paved with pavement, they could be of water. Gondolas and
gondoliers could be the taxis and buses and transportation - using the water
instead of barricading themselves from it. This configuration would also reduce
crime...how many criminals are going to run into the [water] "street?"
Not too many foot chases there... And, of course, the motorized boats (for law
enforcement or businesses) would be eco-friendly and would invigorate the alternative
fuels industry while simultaneously providing faster transportation within city
limits.
The people who ALREADY live there should have first dibs on the real estate
(such as it will be) and would be guaranteed a place to live once construction
was completed and houses were available. They would also be offered employment
FIRST, relative to the rebuild and contingent on each applicant's experience.
Civil engineers and current residents would be put to work revitalizing their
own city in a meaningful way. Locals to N.O. would be given jobs to help with
the construction -- everything from actual construction work to administrative
to acquiring funds, and dispersal of those funds. There would be many new jobs
and many reasons for FOREIGN MONEY to come to the US. It would be an attraction.
It could be great for the people of the whole country...not just New Orleans.
The Dutch are losing their land to the sea. "In
response to rising sea levels, the fierce North Sea and swelling rivers, the
Dutch are designing floating houses, roads, even cities." In the
event that Holland is totally overrun by the sea, we could offer them refuge
here in our great country when their land is gone. The Dutch
are exceedingly resourceful people. They have made tremendous strides in mathematics,
physics,
(15 Dutch people have been awarded the Nobel Prize), and agriculture including,
but not limited to, water management and control. Why not invite them to help
us with this 'water problem' and show the world how Americans DO have a global
consciousness and that we DO want to be a part of what's going on in the world.
We would appear at once magnanimous and mature on the global scene. I would
enjoy being thought of as a country other country's would like to do
business with. I would relish having created such a grand and forward-thinking
place to as our "New Venice."
As it is now, New Orleans (to my current understanding, that is) will be rebuilt
pretty much as it was before. Waiting for a Cat 4 or 5 to drown the place again.
Mr. Bolaris has made significant mention that this year will see an increase
in summer storms (tropical depressions, storm surges and hurricanes) do to the
effects of La
Niña. The people of New Orleans haven't even recovered from Katrina yet.
Those people are in line for more suffering and squalor. It doesn't have to
be this traumatic forever. Can't we think ahead and change that? Can't we change
the face of what the USA means and move into this century?

New Orleans,
post Katrina 2005
It doesn't
have to be this way again...
Peace
Feb 28, 2008 | 2:51 PM
Category:
Political
Feb 25, 2008 | 6:06 PM
Category:
Political
Farrakhan
Praises Obama as ‘Hope of Entire World’
"In his first major public address since a cancer crisis,
Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan said that presidential candidate Barack
Obama is the “hope of the entire world” that the U.S. will change for the better.
The 74-year-old Farrakhan, former leader of the black Muslim group,
never endorsed Obama outright, but spent much of his nearly
two-hour speech Sunday to an estimated crowd of 20,000 people praising the
Illinois senator.
[...]
"Farrakhan also leveled small jabs at Hillary Rodham Clinton, Obama’s
rival for the Democratic nomination, suggesting that she represents the politics
of the past and has been engaging in dirty politics."
Feb 25, 2008 | 1:18 PM
Category:
Political
Hillary Clinton on Tavis Smiley, February 1, 2008:http://www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/video/369.html>run time: 25 mins 1 sec.
Barack Obama on Tavis Smiley, October 18, 2007:http://www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/video/320.html>run time: 23 mins 57 sec.
Feb 24, 2008 | 11:08 PM
Category:
Political

Videostreams for your review and consideration:
Hooked:
Illegal Drugs and How They Got That Way (42 mins 9 sec)
A production of The History Channel, ... covers marijuana & amphetamines
Hooked:
Illegal Drugs and How They Got That Way (42 mins 50 sec)A production of The History Channel, ...
covers opium and heroinHooked:
Illegal Drugs and How They Got That Way (43 min 09 sec)A production of The History Channel, ... covers crack & cocaine.
Hooked:
Illegal Drugs and How They Got That Way (9 min 30 sec)A production of the History Channel, ... [partial] covers lsd & ecstasy.
Feb 20, 2008 | 8:04 PM
Category:
Political
The complete article to which I refer below can be found here:
Where Hillary Went Wrong
The False Hopes Argument
Finding herself in an unexpected battle for nomination, Hillary and her
campaign reframed their attack on Obama, arguing not just that he
lacked experience, but that he was an empty suit, full of rhetoric and
cadence, but not much else. More than anything else, the problem with
this argument was that it was less of an attack on Obama and more of an
attack on Obama supporters. They had been duped, she was arguing,
allowing their hope to be unrealistically inflated, and were in for a
wake-up call if they didn't heed her advice. The attack instantly
struck a cord, an offensive condescension that seemed misplaced and
unfair. Without skipping a beat, Obama's speechwriters responded by
capturing the belittlement felt by his audience: "In the unlikely story
of America," Obama proclaimed, "there is nothing false about hope."I, too, feel many of you are being "duped" by this candidate. I certainly
hope that if he wins, he will be able to govern this country well and be able to shed the shackles of his supporters -- that is, those who bind him to
his Party's interests. After all,
his Party decided to present him to you for candidacy for the Presidency. The ground rules (the ideals that the candidate must represent in order to satisfy the
Party's nomination) have been laid down by them first. Favors and debts must be repaid before one can effect the change they (personally) desire for the country. Senator Clinton has paid her dues in this arena, Senator Obama has not.
Not one candidate skates into office without having their hands
already bound. No matter which candidate surfaces in November, they too will have to come up with George W's $62 billion for Katrina AND $100 billion budget. George W. Bush made promises that are not going to be easily sidestepped. Millions of people are expecting to get their money -- the money that [then] former President Bush promised them and we (taxpayers and other elected officials who vote) agreed to give them. Where is all of THAT money going to come from? The economy is slowing to a grinding halt, clearly we are IN a recession (I mean, "scrap gold??"), and though every candidate may WANT to effect change and to do better, and no matter how we believe they (our candidate) will provide the change and growth we seek as a society, as a nation, or as individuals, their (the winning candidate's) hands are bound by all previous votes and promises (be they
public promises and votes or no.)
Where is the money coming from if I elect Senator Obama? How will he solve this problem? What is Senator Obama going to do about NAFTA? About the North American Union? About government's accountability for the spending of our tax dollars? How transparent will he be if right at this moment I cannot determine if he is going to accept public funding as agreed by the parties, or if he is going to continue to smile and tout his 'change' message while providing no path to same? [See
here.]
It has now come to light that
Senator Obama has officially declined to attend the annual "State of the Black Union" symposium in New Orleans. This important event "will address a largely African-American crowd of thousands in New
Orleans' Ernest M. Morial Convention Center — where thousands of the
city's poorest residents sought shelter in squalid conditions after
Hurricane Katrina in 2005."
Senator Clinton will attend the State of the Black Union symposium. She accepted the invitation
immediately, even though her African-American supporters were decidedly alienated after South Carolina. She is still reaching out to those she promised to represent and fight for.
I believe Senator Clinton to be the better suited candidate for the situations in which the United States currently finds itself. I definitely think Senator Obama will be a great President
someday and I very much look forward to being one of his supporters then. But I do not believe Senator Obama is the best candidate for the job(s) of President of the United States of America
right now. If Senator Obama could
provide a viable means as to how he is going to generate billions in funds and thousands of jobs to make his claims of change more authentic ... then I will vote for him.