MyFox
 

Michelle_Williams's Blog

by Michelle_Williams from Philadelphia

Last Post 97 days, 22 hours Ago


Do you have OnStar or an analog cell phone?

I want to hear from you!

Why?

Read on..... then email me if you are in this situation!

Thanks!

NEW YORK (AP) -- When Adele Rothman bought her 16-year-old son a

car in 2003, she made sure to pick one that had OnStar, the onboard

communications and safety system.

What the Scarsdale, N.Y., resident didn't know was that the

OnStar system in the car was already doomed to die. The federal

government decided in 2002 to let cellular carriers shut down

analog cell phone networks, used by Rothman's Saab and about

500,000 other OnStar-equipped cars, after Feb. 18, 2008.

It's the end of the nationwide network that launched the U.S.

wireless industry 24 years ago, and it leaves a surprising number

of users like Adele Rothman in the lurch.

OnStar told Rothman in March its service would stop at the end

of this year, in anticipation of the network shutdown in February.

"I was really upset," she said, "because that was my tieline"

to her son.

Perhaps a million cell phones will lose service, but those are

cheap and easy to replace. The effects will be felt the most by

people who have things that aren't phones but have built-in

wireless capabilities, like OnStar cars and home alarm systems.

The shutdown date has been known years in advance, but some

industries appear to have a had a problem updating their

technologies and informing their customers in advance, which raises

the question of whether the effects will be even more widespread

the next time a network is turned off, given the proliferation of

wireless technology.

General Motors Corp., which owns OnStar, started modifying its

cars after the 2002 decision by the Federal Communications

Commission to let the network die, but some cars made as late as

2005 can't use digital networks for OnStar, nor can they be

upgraded. For some cars made in the intervening years, GM provides

digital upgrades for $15.

In 2006, OnStar said it had let customers know of the shutdown

with a posting on its Web site. This year, it said it had notified

all affected customers. Spokeswoman Cristi Chojnacki said she was

unable to comment beyond those statements. General Motors and other

car manufacturers with similar systems, including Daimler AG's

Mercedes-Benz, are facing a potential class-action lawsuit over the

analog shutdown.

When Rothman complained, GM sent a $500 coupon toward the

purchase of a new car. To compensate for the lack of OnStar, she

outfitted her son's car with a handsfree system and a Global

Positioning System.

A week before the end-of-year shutdown, the analog coverage map

is still the first one presented on OnStar's Web site. The digital

coverage map, showing large areas of "limited" service in

out-of-the-way places, is available on another page.

On the home alarm side, about 400,000 systems still use analog

service, according to Lou Fiore, chairman of the Alarm Industry

Communications Committee. In most of those systems, the wireless

link to the alarm center is a backup to the landline. But some

homes lack a landline, so the wireless link is the only connection

to the outside world.

Fiore doesn't know the current number of systems that only use

analog wireless connections and no landline, but a survey by the

AICC a few years ago put the number at 138,000.

"The larger (alarm) companies are in pretty good shape," Fiore

said. "There are so many smaller companies out there that are

probably, I'd say, in denial. They just don't know about it."

To complicate things, some alarm systems advertised as

"digital" actually use a digital subchannel of the analog

network. True digital alarm system modems did not become available

until 2006, according to the AICC.

According to the FCC, many analog alarms that have not been

replaced by the time the network is shut down will start beeping to

warn that they've lost the connection to the alarm center.

The Central Station Alarm Association, an alarm industry group

and the parent of the AICC, tried to get the FCC to delay the

analog sunset.

The FCC turned away that request this year, saying digital

networks are a much better use of the airwaves. The same spectrum

can carry about 16 times more traffic using digital technology

compared to analog.

Verizon Wireless, AT&T Inc. and Alltel Corp. are the largest

carriers that still have analog networks. Alltel will take more

time than Verizon and AT&T to close its network, shutting down in

three stages ending in September. Each carrier will keep its

portion of the newly available spectrum, and will use it to boost

their digital services.

6 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 6
Page 1 of 1
electrons read my blog
Dec 27, 2007 | 8:10 AM

Great story! I think heads are going to roll over this. While I do agree that analog networks should be phased out for many reasons, I have a hunch that these people were not told when they purchased their vehicles, or perhaps it was buried in the fine print of the paperwork.

I think more people will no longer subscribe to OnStar.

mystere read my blog view my photos
Jan 2, 2008 | 2:05 PM

Michelle,

I'm from Southern California, and Fox 11 Los Angeles had reported about this quite a while back, and I subscribe to Verizon Wireless. I started out with Airtouch, which became Verizon, and my first phone in 1997 was an analog phone. After about 4 years, Verizon started phasing out analog services in Southern California. My phone had problems back then, but since I needed an upgrade because my phone had gotten quite beaten up, I got a phone with more than 1 mode. That solved all of my problems with reception, and I was happy, since batteries for my old phone became hard to find. About a Year ago, I broke my antenna, and went to a service center for a replacement. The service center notified me of some changes which you are now writing about...this also includes the On Star stuff. Most customers must now be aware that changes like this can occur without notice. Now I drive cars and trucks that are over 25 years old, and if I do get a new vehicle, I won't be buying anything from General Motors. The On Star subscriptions irritate me...they really should make those devices easily replaceable...perhaps a unit that is bolted onto the car, and with a special shaped wiring harness for powering the unit, and activating it when needed, but upgradeable with new harness adapters made for the older car being upgraded. GM needs to think about the customers who don't want to take on car payments, if they want repeat customers.

Mr. E from Orange County California (MyFoxLA)

mystere read my blog view my photos
Jan 2, 2008 | 2:08 PM

Oh yes Michelle:

Bob DeCastro is doing a great job here in Southern California...I read your bio!

movealready read my blog
Jan 2, 2008 | 2:22 PM

It's called "planned obselecence". These corporations design products and market them while new designs are on the drawing board or are already in production. If produts never improved, or were phased out there would be no reason for consumers to buy. The parameters of the new design are usually incompatble with the old design and associated products. Let's look at the CD player for example: A product that works pefectly well without the need for improvement. The next generation of CD, the disk is much smaller. Why, so you have to update and spend money. It how business works. if they gave you that information up front, would you have purchased OnStar? Of course not. Everything you buy comes with a corporate experation date. Let the buyer beware.

electrons read my blog
Jan 3, 2008 | 8:09 AM

Good point movealready.... Look at Microsoft. They do "planned obsolescence" best. Vista gets released and everyone is told how great it is over XP. Ummm....it is the SAME functionality with a different look. How they pull that off is amazing! The average salary for a software engineer is $80,000. Microsoft must have hundreds of them. To keep going, you must come out with new products, or "make it look new".

No wonder they tried to get into the iPod business with their attempt at making their own iPod named the "Zune player". That failed miserably, yet they do not want you to know that. If you recall, the chief of marketing for the Zune stepped down. Hmmmm.....

PERTZ read my blog view my photos
Jan 3, 2008 | 7:53 PM

Brilliant

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Michelle_Williams

Michelle is an Emmy-award winning journalist and consumer reporter for the Real Deal on Fox 29 News.

Member Since: 3/7/2007