MyFox
 

MarkChristopher's Blog

by MarkChristopher from Palm Coast

Last Post 398 days, 13 hours Ago


SAN FRANCISCO (June 23) - Is city water better than bottled water? Mayor Gavin Newsom thinks so.

Newsom has issued an executive order banning city departments from buying bottled water, even for water coolers. The ban goes into effect July 1, and will extend to water coolers by Dec. 1.

The move was billed as a way to help stem global warming and save taxpayer money.
"We're hoping to set the example for the private sector and other cities in getting off the bottle," said Tony Winnicker, spokesman for the San Francisco public utilities commission.

In a press release announcing the decision, the mayor cited the environmental impact of making, transporting and disposing of the bottles. More than a billion of them end up in the state's landfills each year, the release said.

When the ban goes into effect, city and county offices will dispense municipal tap water from a reservoir. Winnicker said exceptions will be made in cases where potable water is not easily available or poses health concerns.

What do you think about this bottled water ban???

I drink bottled water, however I always put my empty bottles in the recyle bin. I would not say Florida's water from the tap is cleaner than bottled water?

7 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 7
Page 1 of 1
BrendaG read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2007 | 2:26 PM

This is stupid! Unless they are going to ban soda too. I mean they use the same type of bottle don't they? I can't imagine they are referring to the big 5 gallon cooler bottles because they have a deposit on them averaging $5. Sounds like maybe the "city" is wanting to sell their own bottled water?

DoninOrlando read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2007 | 4:14 PM

You have agreement here.... I see both sides of the coin....but if banning 1 type of bottle, ban them all.

I see a lawsuit in the near future... I'm sure the industry will feel it..

rsaforfun read my blog
Jun 24, 2007 | 7:02 PM

maybe i didn't understand what was said but it sounded to me like it is just banning the city offices from buying it...which is tax payers money. the city don't supply soda...but why should they pay for bottled water when the tap water is fine. if the employees want bottled water let them buy thier own. it doesnt say no bottled water in the city just not at city expense

cranewatcher
Jun 25, 2007 | 12:37 AM

Certain states have deposits on every can and bottle (5 - 10 cents) and you wpuld be amazed at how this cuts back on trash. We also recycle, but if you took your bottles back every time you bought more, it might solve the problem.

Sarge read my blog
Jun 25, 2007 | 5:24 PM

Sounds to me like a politician trying to find a way to stuff more taxpayer money into the city's coffers. Evidently, the SF water utility is not getting enough revenue to justify its existence since people are buying bottled water. Gotta turn on the "tap" to get more "green" for the city (pun ABSOLUTELY intended). LOL

DaytonaFrank read my blog view my photos
Jun 25, 2007 | 8:44 PM

I drink tap water and keep a bottle of it in the fridge. I laugh at people that pay a dollar or more for a small bottle of water!

Boogyman read my blog view my photos
Jun 26, 2007 | 12:07 AM

I think the mayor should really focus on which one of his friends wife he going to shag next

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




MarkChristopher

I have been a resident of Palm Coast since September of 2001. I am twenty four, and work in banking. I have lived in Florida my whole life, and originally came from Miami.

Member Since: 9/4/2006