MyFox
 

Common_Sense's Blog

by Common_Sense from Phoenix

Last Post 283 days, 19 hours Ago


I've been following the story on WKYC about Hope Steffey, the woman who was arrested and "strip searched" (according to WKYC). WKYC's slogan is "Report the Facts. Respect the Truth." Yet, they are doing neither in this twisted, slanted story. They are pandering to the plantiffs in a civil lawsuit, and they are smearing the Sheriff's Office. I hope the sheriff sues WKYC.

The FACTS and the TRUTH: Police were called regarding a family fight. When they arrived, they began to interview the parties.  Hope Steffey then provided the officers with "her" indentification...which was determined to be her dead sister's driver's license.  Providing false ID is a crime.  When the officer refused to return the license, Steffey ATTACKED him and tried to take the license from him.  She became abusive and hysterical.  She refused to calm down, and was arrested for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest.

Upon reaching the jail, Steffey continued to scream and shout demands.  As is routine, deputies asked Steffey if she had thoughts of hurting herself.  Steffey replied something to the effect of "now or later?"

As is policy in virtually EVERY jail in America, if a prisoner even hints that they may be thinking of harming themselves, they are put on "suicide watch."  "Suicide watch" means that their clothing is removed, and they are put into a special cell with absolutely nothing they can use to jarm themselves.  They are then observed every few minutes and the visits are logged.  This policy has reduced jail suicides to virtually none.

Steffey was asked to disrobe.  She refused.  Women deputies then attempted to disrobe her.  Steffey violently resisted to the point that the female officers asked for assistance from male officers.  Steffey was then placed into the suicide watch cell.

WKYC continues to claim that Steffey was "strip searched."  That's a complete lie.  WKYC continues to call Steffey a "victim."  Steffey changed her status from victim to suspect when she provided a fake ID and then attacked a police officer.

WKYC quotes Steffey, her husband, and their attorney as if their word is gospel...while brazenly accusing the sheriff's office of lying.  Thanks to the support of WKYC, the Steffey's and their ambulance-chasing lawyers are hoping to profit from Steffey's tantrum via a lawsuit against the county.

WKYC's reprehensible twisting of this story is why in polls people put the integrity of the news media below even that of personal injury lawyers.  This is pure sleazy sensationalism coupled with lies being foisted off on the public by WKYC. 

In order to keep the "story" going and cause as much damage as they can, WkYC is trying to get the U.S. Justice Department and the state Attorney General involved.  I call that "creating the news."  Pure sleaze.

2 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 2
Page 1 of 1
ElJefe3126
Mar 26, 2008 | 5:21 PM

I'd love to know where you got your "facts". WKYC admitted on the air that there was some bias to the story since they only had the plaintiff's side, and the Sheriff's Dept. refused to provide details to them. Frankly, I've spent dozens of hours researching this, and short of pumping out several hundred dollars for a trial transcript (over 200 pages at $1.65 per!), I don't know where you'd get that kind of information.

I do know that Tom Meyer, the WKYC investigate reporter who broke the story, did enough fact checking to knew that there were conflicting reports as to whether Hope Steffey had been drinking that night. That alone should tell you that he didn't just blindly take the plaintiff's word for everything.

Your assertion that Hope Steffey attacked Officer Gurlea is 180 degrees from the assertions in the legal documents filed by the plaintiffs in federal court. (According to Hope's cousin Trinette Zorger, Gurlea and Zorger were discussing unrelated items when he suddenly turned, grasped Steffey, and slammed her against his cruiser.) I guess that just goes to show there are two sides to every story, eh?

When asked, "Have you thoughts of hurting yourself?", she alledgedly replied, "Now or ever?" Pretty different spin than, "now or later?", eh? And notice that the question would, if answered honestly, put nearly half of all people booked into that facility on suicide watch. Suicidal people do need to be protected from themselves. But since the story aired, several more women have stepped forward to claim that they, too, were stripped and held nude when

ElJefe3126
Mar 26, 2008 | 5:23 PM

(at least in their minds) they were clearly not suicidal.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Common_Sense

A police officer for 14 years, and a Valley resident for 30 years. I work with the Boy Scouts of America, the Girl Scouts of America, the Fraternal Order of Police, and numerous trade organizations including the National Narcotics Detection Dog Association and the National Narcotics Interdiction Officers' Association.

Member Since: 1/12/2007