MyFox

ad link

AUGUSTALLEN28's Blog

by AUGUSTALLEN28

Last Post 45 days, 11 hours Ago

A Gay President???

Feb 18, 2008 | 12:43 PM
Category: News

Report This Post

There's been a great deal of talk and excitement about this year could possibly produce the first Black or First Female to ever be President of the United States.We've come along way,but have we really? I started to get a little curious and wondered just how far we really have come. Would you vote for a Gay or Lesbian Commander in Chief? is America ready for something like that? Would you be willing ? Does it matter?

44 Comments | Add a Comment

Feb 18, 2008 | 1:20 PM

It wouldn't matter to me as long as they were openly gay. That way the chances of blackmail are a lot less.

As long as that person is capable of working for all of us I have no problem w/race, gender or sexuality.

MoonOwl

FloydFreak

Feb 18, 2008 | 1:47 PM

Would you vote for a Gay or Lesbian Commander in Chief?

If it was For_The_People or DEOP running, the answer would be an unequivocal "NO"! However, I would not necessarily let sexual orientation of a qualified individual factor into the equation.

I don't think that it's ever going to happen, however.

shadows

Feb 18, 2008 | 3:36 PM

What makes you assume that we haven't already had a gay or bisexual president? Don't ask, don't tell has been a government policy for more than most seem to realize.

bobnash
Feb 18, 2008 | 3:43 PM

George Bush isn't gay enough for you?
We don't have a woman or black president yet.

pattiep

Feb 18, 2008 | 4:08 PM

I for one would rather not know because that would always be on my mind every time I hear their name. Right shadows, don't ask, don't tell. It would probably be better for everyone if they kept it in the closet. But as we all know it would eventually come out. I don't want to know what kind of sex my commender and chief has. Being president of the United States of America is not a soap opera.

AUGUSTALLEN28

Feb 18, 2008 | 4:19 PM

I'm pretty sure we've already had a Gay President before,but not open.

Abunai

Feb 18, 2008 | 4:28 PM

Well then I guess we couldn't get all upset when something like the Foley case with sexual texting and email to a page gets exposed by a party that gave Studs who had actual homosexual sex with a page a pass after senturing them. We have openly gay leaders now who get caught running gay brothels out of their D.C. appartments with their boyfriends.(Barney Franks)

Don't forget Janet Reno in the Clinton administration who upon entering her position had the gay and lezbian community begging her to come out of the closet publically for no reason other than a childish sticking out the tongue at America.

Sexual preference should have nothing to do with ability to hold office or position.

AUGUSTALLEN28

Feb 18, 2008 | 4:44 PM

Abunai,I find it interesting you would compare Gay & Lesbian with Pedophile behavior and prostitution,and lump them all together.
When they are not synonymous.

sabaii

Feb 18, 2008 | 5:10 PM

We had a president that wasn't married. So he must have been gay. J. Edgar H was gay and he did a great job. Probably decorated his office real nice.

AUGUSTALLEN28

Feb 18, 2008 | 5:17 PM

sabaii,J.Edgar Hoover was the Director of the FBI,not president.

sensiblejoe

Feb 18, 2008 | 5:20 PM

"Senturing" them? What does that mean, Abunai? That word isn't in the English dictionary.

Promiscuity and infidelity aren't synonymous with homosexuality, as Gingrich, Giuliani and Vetter, among the current Republican sex scandals, show.

Sexual orientation has nothing to do with being able to perform in public service. Intelligence, integrity, honesty, decisiveness and respect for the Constitution and the law do -- and there's been a glaring dearth of those requisites among the "decent, God-fearing" heterosexuals running our body politic the past seven years.

PastorD

Feb 18, 2008 | 5:33 PM

I am sure in history there must have been "closet gays". I have no problem voting for a person based on their qualifications. However, many religious people, who are not "Finatics" are going to have a problem voting for such a person because their personl choice will conflict with their Christian ethics.. It's hard for people to separate the two...

I also bring up the point and example of "Susie Stanton" He/She, was definately qualified for the job of city manager. However, because of the issues surrounding Her/Him, it became a side show!!!!! I just think we have enough clowns and side shows in Washington. President, is a serious job and I don't think there is enough time for the circus to be in town... Because of that, I would not be willing to vote for a gay person at this time.

sabaii

Feb 18, 2008 | 5:43 PM

Dearest August; I know that but my sentences must have been too close together. Hey, help out there. Who was the single president? An old pres like Coolidge, I can't remember. My point with J. Edgar was that he sucessfully hid his queenness without controversy. The FBI headquarters are still called the J.Edgar Hoover building right?

BornToBeWild

Feb 18, 2008 | 5:52 PM

I wouldn't care if they were male..female..gay..straight..black..blue..or a little green marshin, as long as they are truthful and they do they job working for the people and our country!!!

sabaii

Feb 18, 2008 | 6:03 PM

What a beautiful idea. Rainbows, lollipops for all and a chicken in every garage.

Abunai

Feb 18, 2008 | 6:36 PM

"Abunai,I find it interesting you would compare Gay & Lesbian with Pedophile behavior and prostitution,and lump them all together.
When they are not synonymous."

Exactly where is Pedophile behavior referenced? But since you brought it up: Pedophilia is a cultural moral line, and can be hetrosexual or homosexual...

If you are refering to the pages in either story, their ages were of concenting limits for a matter of fact.

But as far as the topic goes.. the point is you already have them in the legislature out in the open. Executive Branch or Judicial make up the other 3 legs if you will. Who really cares. It makes as much sense as people trying to make Romney's mormon religion an aspect and forgetting that the Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is mormon and been re-elected 3 times and on his way to his 4th in 2012.
I think worrying about such things only distracts from what we should be focused on in the selection of our leaders. Too many people dont take it anymore serious than voting for someone in a reality show.

BrendaG

Feb 18, 2008 | 6:37 PM

To me it doesn't matter if they are black, white, gay, heterosexual, male or female.

If they can do the job, then they should have the job. But to vote for a candidate just because they are a woman, gay or black is just stupid! Stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote!

rottweiler7575

Feb 18, 2008 | 6:42 PM

Why would that matter, if they can do the job, its none of my business what they do behind closed doors..Just don't pull a Clinton and run on FAMILY VALUES and then CHEAT and LIE about it while in OFFICE> I can deal with most things, but Lieing, Cheatting and then thinking is OK.. He was a great EXAMPLE for the KIDS....

sabaii

Feb 18, 2008 | 6:47 PM

Watch what you say about our next vice president.

AUGUSTALLEN28

Feb 18, 2008 | 7:18 PM

Do any of you feel America is ready for something like this happening in the near future?

Page 1 of 3

Last

Write your comment below: Email me when a new comment is added to this entry

AUGUSTALLEN28

It's A Star

Member Since: 7/15/2006

ad link

View All Photos

RSS: What is RSS?

Many pages in this Fox Television Stations, Inc. web site feature links to other sites, some of which are operated by companies unrelated to Fox Television Stations, Inc. Fox Television Stations, Inc. has no control over the content or availability of any linked site.

Inside Fox:
Hot List About Us Good Day TV Listings Politics